I (and by extension other people in the research team) will probably only ever use user_ids (which we know in advance are valid), so it’s probably best to ask Program Evauation folks or community members who may rely on usernames.
On Nov 21, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Edward. Yes, we temporarily lost the UI that shows what users are > invalid. I wasn't sure what exactly people needed here so I didn't hazard a > guess. The data is all there though and I can easily show you invalid users > and invalid reasons for your cohort. > > I just maybe need you and someone else to say how you'd like it to work and I > can whip up a view for it tomorrow. Dario, any opinion on how invalid users > should be displayed? The only weird part now is that you can't upload again. > You'd have to delete the whole cohort and start over... > — > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Edward Galvez <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also! Just to introduce myself, I'm one of the interns with the Program > Evaluation & Design team - thus this upgrade is very timely. Thank you! > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Edward Galvez <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for this! Just did a cohort of 15K and it worked fine. I > unintentionally hit the "back" button, but after clicking "forward" and my > cohort was validated, not even 10 seconds later. > > Also, I can't seem to find the place that listed which users were not valid. > Did we lose that ability? > > - E > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dario Taraborelli > <[email protected]> wrote: > fantastic, is there any chance we could get an even better performance if we > allowed users to specify the field type in the upload form (if it’s just > user_ids, validation will be faster and the app doesn’t need to check every > single entry for a valid user_name too). I understand that by design the > application makes no assumption about the type of that field (and in fact it > accepts a mix of user_id’s and user_names, correct)? > > absolutely, it would run up to 2x faster if the file was all user_ids and the > user specified that up front. But currently, yes, you can mix user_ids and > user_names > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimetrics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimetrics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
_______________________________________________ Wikimetrics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
