>
> Yes it's certainly a first draft!! :-) Thanks for trying it out.
>
> With the disambig pages, can you suggest how to detect them?
>

Not sure.
Could you detect the presence of the Q6148868 templates ? (and same thing
for Q15701815 ).
Or else maybe with the categories.


> Ah, there's a couple of other bugs here:
>
> The page https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Accroupissements actually
> already has a WIkidata ID, but the ws-search database didn't know about
> it :-( probably because it was failing for a while on some weird
> problems. I've re-run the scraper, and now that work is showing up with
> it's proper Q-number:
> https://tools.wmflabs.org/ws-search/?title=Accroupissements&author=&lang=
> fr
>
> The idea with the quickstatements is that it'll only show it for works
> that are *not yet* linked to wikidata. This is where the disambig
> problem comes in, because there doesn't seem to be a simple way to
> determine what's an edition and what's a work without resorting to
> Wikidata. We could look at categories? Is it a truth universally
> acknowledged that pages in the categories defined as
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15939659 are all disambiguation pages?
> That could work...
>

The truth (and I guess it is universal but could someone confirm?) is that
pages with 'multiples editions' are 'works' (Q571, this is what I do for
fr.wikisource at least).

Thank you for all the work!

Cdlt, ~nicolas
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Reply via email to