Sorry, I am much more of a Wikidatan than a Wikisourcerer! I was referring to items like this one https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21125368
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Nicolas VIGNERON < vigneron.nico...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-10-31 10:00 GMT+01:00 Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com>: > >> We want the disambiguation pages on Wikisource - I checked a few of these >> and there are a lot of women and "younger sons" in them that we want. Also, >> many can be connected to existing "family of ..." pages or name >> disambiguation pages - they definitely help enrich our understanding of the >> problems of disambiguation over time. >> > > I'm guessing you're talking about pages in https://en.wikisource.org/ > wiki/Category:Author_disambiguation_pages (which only exist on en.ws) but > they are in the Author: namespace and (if Im' not mistaken) the WS search > tool here only look in the main namespace (as it's focused on editions). > > So this is a bit besides this mail thread but still, you are very right, > for people in particular and for everything in general, disambig pages are > indeed important and ideally the tool should not just discard them as 'not > edition' (if technically possible to spot them obviously). > > Cdlt, ~nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
