>From a Wikidata point of view, it's really good to have one dedicated page ofr the "work" and different ones for the "editions": you can structure both Wikisource and Wikidata with a clear structure, without ambiguities.
This is an example of a Wikisource Work page: https://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Opera:Filocolo These are very important books that have had different editions in the past, and a dedicated namespace is good so you can have * dedicated templates * dedicated categories * dedicated layout A disambiguation page is in ns0, and it's conceptually different from a "multiple edition" page... So in this way is easy to tell the difference. On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON < [email protected]> wrote: > 2017-10-31 18:45 GMT+01:00 Andrea Zanni <[email protected]>: > >> For the "work" concept, Italian Wikisource decided to create a real and >> new namespace, "Opera" (which means work). >> It's the one page where we store the links to multiple editions of a >> certain book we have. >> >> It's not a disambiguation page in the sense that a disambiguation page >> works with different books from different authors with the same title >> e.g. "Poems"... >> >> Aubrey >> > > I forgot about that too. > Aubrey; Could you tell us the advantage and inconvenient of this system > (and in comparison to the 'multiple editions' pages of the others > Wikisources). > > Cdlt, ~nicolas > > PS: this is the kind of question that would be interesting to have during > a hangout session like we had (I will write a separate mail to re-launch > them) > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
