Gerard Meijssen schrieb: > Hoi, > There is RDF, there is Semantic MediaWiki. Why should one get a push and the > other not. Semantic MediaWiki is used on production websites. Its usability > is continuously being improved. No cobwebs there.
SMW is of course an option for integrating metadata, but I expect it will take considerably more time to review that and get it usable on wmf sites. > Having machine readable information is great, but would it not make more > sense to have human readable text. As in not only English ? Sure, but I don't see the connection. The RDF extension just adds the machine readable stuff to the human readable stuff we already have. It's basically for annotating templates, and retrieving that annotation. -- daniel _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
