On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoi, > If this is true, you just provided the best argument why the setup of > Bugzilla should be changed. You do not want to have the tools that report on > the availability of your production servers to be dependent on those same > production servers. > Thanks, > GerardM > > 2009/3/11 Chad <[email protected]> > >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Tim Starling <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > K. Peachey wrote: >> >>> Please report urgent system administration issues to IRC, specifically >> >>> #wikimedia-tech on irc.freenode.net. >> >>> >> >>> -- Tim Starling >> >> Not everyone knows how to use IRC, i would recommend that you >> >> recommend people report to bugzilla with urgent tags instead. >> > >> > That would just be a nuisance. By the time we check Bugzilla for new >> > issues, urgent problems are already fixed due to IRC reports or >> > automated alerts. We would have to waste time finding and closing all >> > the relevant bugs. I would suggest either using IRC or waiting patiently. >> > >> > -- Tim Starling >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wikitech-l mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >> > >> >> Not to mention, depending on the error it could be entirely possible >> that Bugzilla is down as well. >> >> -Chad >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l >
Which is one of several reasons we _don't_ handle urgent sysadmin stuff via Bugzilla. What's your point? -Chad _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
