Gerard Meijssen wrote: > 2009/3/11 Chad <[email protected]> wrote: >> Not to mention, depending on the error it could be entirely possible >> that Bugzilla is down as well. > > If this is true, you just provided the best argument why the setup of > Bugzilla should be changed. You do not want to have the tools that report on > the availability of your production servers to be dependent on those same > production servers.
Bugzilla is not such a tool, as I already said. There is no need for it to be up when the site generally is down. -- Tim Starling _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
