On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Lane, Ryan
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is MediaWiki such a special piece of
>> software that it's impossible to build a good package?
>
> It's "special". It isn't necessarily the fault of the distro or the package
> maintainer for the quality of the packages. It is our fault. Upgrading is
> unreliable for a number of reasons. It is definitely unreliable enough that
> I wouldn't trust a package to do it for me, and I can't reasonably recommend
> it for anyone else either.

Fair enough.  Is it safe to assume that the new installer work should
make proper packaging more viable?

> I think it would be better if we provided the packages. If we fix our
> upgrade issues, I'll be more than happy to write rpms and debs.

I think this would be fantastic, so defining what bar we need to clear
would be seems like a worthwhile exercise.  Even if distro makers
still go off and create their own derivatives, having a good reference
implementation would be wonderful.

I think you'd be hard pressed to find a project that doesn't complain
about what packagers do (assuming they don't do their own packaging,
and even then...)

Rob

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to