Hi all,

I suggest we have one static class variable Selenium::$settings which is set up 
as an array. This array would be filled in some init function from whatever 
sources we decide on. Then, internally, the configuration mechanisms would not 
change anymore, and we could use the init method to fill the settings from 
globals (as is) or ini files (as Mark propses). Those who use the framework, 
however, would not have to rewrite their code.

Regards,
Markus

Markus Glaser
Social Web Technologien
Leiter Softwareentwicklung
Hallo Welt! - Medienwerkstatt GmbH
__________________________________

Untere Bachgasse 15
93047 Regensburg

Tel.   +49 (0) 941 - 56 95 94 92
Fax.  +49 (0) 941 - 50 27 58 13


www.hallowelt.biz
[email protected]

Sitz: Regensburg
Handelsregister: HRB 10467
E.USt.Nr.: DE 253050833
Geschäftsführer:
Anja Ebersbach, Markus Glaser, 
Dr. Richard Heigl, Radovan Kubani


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von dan nessett
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. September 2010 17:20
An: Wikimedia developers; Mark A. Hershberger
Betreff: Re: [Wikitech-l] Selenium Framework - test run configuration data

I would be happy to coordinate with you. Up to this point I have been working 
with Markus Glaser and that has gone pretty well. But, I would welcome more 
discussion on issues, architecture and implementation strategy for the 
Framework as well as making sure anything I do fits in with what others are 
doing.

Regards,

Dan

--- On Tue, 9/7/10, Mark A. Hershberger <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Mark A. Hershberger <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Selenium Framework - test run configuration data
> To: "Wikimedia developers" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Dan Nessett" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2010, 8:04 AM Dan Nessett 
> <[email protected]>
> writes:
> 
> > Either approach works. But, by going back and forth,
> it makes development
> > of functionality for the Framework difficult.
> 
> I should also point out that what I was planning to do was not hidden.
> I wrote about these changes in my weekly report the Monday before I 
> committed them (http://bit.ly/cqAcqz) and pointed to the weekly report 
> from my Ohloh, Twitter, Identi.ca and Facebook accounts.
> 
> Granted, this is not the same as posting to the mailing list, and for 
> that I apologize.
> 
> Looking back in the archives on gmane, it looks like you are very 
> interested in MW testing.  Since this is a large part of my focus 
> currently as well, perhaps we should coordinate our work?
> 
> Mark.
> 
> --
> http://hexmode.com/
> 
> Embrace Ignorance.  Just don't get too attached.
> 


      

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to