This advice is all well and good, unless someone in particular actually 
is misguided. Glad to see people jumping on the chance to posture 
themselves as superior communicators - that's also really productive!

- Trevor

On 12/9/10 9:28 AM, Aaron Schulz wrote:
> +1 to this. Lets focus more on the changes and ideas and less on the authors.
>
> IMO, when I keep seeing things like "he did"/"he changed" and "[so and so]
> made it so that" instead of things like "the change made" it throws up red
> flags. Just discuss the change, and mention the person minimally (to help
> identify the changes or get the attention of person X) or not at all. I've
> also seen a lot of things like "misguided" and "bad idea" by some people.
> This raises red flags too. Just discuss *what* the problems are, rather than
> saying "this decision sucks".
>
> I've seen this pattern by more than one person.
>
> Tim Starling-2 wrote:
>> On 08/12/10 03:11, Trevor Parscal wrote:
>>> These blank lines should not - under any circumstances - be here. But I
>>>
>>> do know why they are...
>>>
>>> Tim Starling modified the standard distribution of JSMin[1] in some good
>>> and some bad ways. These blank lines are the result of one of these
>>> modifications which I find to be misguided. He's basically only
>>> compressed horizontal white-space, leaving new line characters in place.
>>> The blank lines you see are where the comments used to be.
>>>
>>> I have made this point before, clearly upon deaf ears - but I will make
>>> it again.
>> You could have just said "because Tim thought it would make debugging
>> easier", and left out all the insults: "misguided", "deaf ears", etc.
>> We've each given our opinions on this issue previously, the only thing
>> you've added here is a dollop of incivility.
>>
>> Your bullying has not changed my position. I think this is a minor
>> issue, and I have better things to do than to argue about it. I don't
>> intend on doing any more work on JSMin for the time being. Feel free
>> to make the relevant change yourself.
>>
>> -- Tim Starling
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>
>>

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to