On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Trevor Parscal <[email protected]> wrote:
> This advice is all well and good, unless someone in particular actually
> is misguided. Glad to see people jumping on the chance to posture
> themselves as superior communicators - that's also really productive!
>
> - Trevor

This is quickly getting OT. This is a productive list guys, lets keep
it that way :)

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Trevor Parscal <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/8/10 3:40 PM, Andrew Garrett wrote:
>> I think the point is that it makes bug reports that much easier to
>> understand when they're reported by somebody who isn't in debug mode. This
>> has to be traded off against the performance advantages of removing blank
>> lines. Is there any data on how significant the performance improvements
>> are?

+1. I'd really like to see data on this as well. Linebreaks just seem inherently
useful, and I think we need to make a stronger case for performance if we're
going to remove them.

> You expect users to have the expertise to report a bug which includes a
> line number where the bug occurred, yet you don't expect they will be
> able to add debug=true to the URL when asked to do so? Also, the
> critical part of reporting a bug is rarely the only information needed
> to fix a problem.
>

I don't think it's about expertise at all.

For what it's worth, we also get a good number of drive-by bug reports,
so *expecting* followup to a bug can leave you with nothing.

> Is there any data on how significant the number of or quality of bug
> reports will be impaired by this?
>

No, and given the subjective nature of quality, I don't think you could
easily measure it.

> We would be the only web site I know of, certainly the only web site of
> similar size to choose to try and retain line-numbers in production
> output. I suspect that they are still functioning just fine.
>

There's lots of other differences between us and other sites of our
size, so we shouldn't always look to our neighbors for advice :)

-Chad

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to