plese see cc rel: http://labs.creativecommons.org/2011/ccrel-guide/ <http://labs.creativecommons.org/2011/ccrel-guide/> Chinese wikipedia: http://zh.wikipedia.org/ My blog: http://shizhao.org twitter: https://twitter.com/shizhao
[[zh:User:Shizhao]] 2011/1/24 Lars Aronsson <[email protected]> > On 01/22/2011 08:15 PM, Bryan Tong Minh wrote: > > Having a clear separate input text field "Author: ____" is much more > > user friendly {{#fileauthor:}}, which is so to say, a type of obscure > > MediaWiki jargon. > > I disagree. In real life, there are always more compliated > cases, where an author is not an author, but two authors > or a sculptor, or one painter and one photographer. These > things never fit in a single "author" field, and the same goes > for any other separated fields. But the free-form Wikipedia > can handle all real-world cases in plain human language. > > Various "expert systems" based on "artificial intelligence" > existed since the 1980s, but none of them produced a > universal encyclopedia. Only the text-based Wikipedia did. > After this humiliating fact, the same AI people (now dressed > as "semantic web" scholars) come and claim that they too > could have built Wikipedia, if it only were more structured. > They are wrong, of course. Lack of structure is precisely > what built Wikipedia. > > > -- > Lars Aronsson ([email protected]) > Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
