On 3/23/11 2:13 PM, Robert Leverington wrote: > On 2011-03-23, Neil Kandalgaonkar wrote: >> On 3/22/11 6:05 PM, Rob Lanphier wrote: >> >>> Our code review tool is pretty nice, but we can't let it >>> be the tail that wags the dog. >> >> At the risk of being impolite -- our code review tool is not that nice. >> (I don't expect that anyone who worked on it would even disagree with me >> here.) >> >> It happens to be our home grown tool, and it uses a framework that more >> of us are familiar with. But it's not such an overwhelming asset that we >> should consider staying on SVN because of it. In 2011 there are lots of >> code review frameworks out there to choose from. > > There's nothing stopping a Git backend being created for the code review > extension.
Perhaps I was unclear. My point was that I personally would like to *not* use our current code review system. By that I mean both the general paradigm we have, and the tools we are using. I'm asserting that: - There are other software frameworks for code review with more and better features. - There are other code review paradigms that are better for team health, other than "let's spend several months on the backlog every time we want to release". -- Neil Kandalgaonkar (| <ne...@wikimedia.org> _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
