"Brion Vibber" <br...@wikimedia.org> wrote in message news:BANLkTi=fayp8ekgw4aoag+j+-lkpz+n...@mail.gmail.com... > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:56 AM, MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote: > > A 'NEEDINFO' resolution would probably be better than 'WONTFIX' for this > case, and we should see if we can enable that. Ensuring that devs know > where > to go to ask for a status & consensus update in case the original filer & > CC'd people are unavailable would also help to make these go more > consistently. > > Again, it would be better to have a 'NEEDINFO' resolution enabled for us > to > use in this case. > > > -- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org / brion @ pobox.com)
The default BZ configuration comes, AFAIK, with a REMIND resolution. This was briefly reenabled during the BZ4 upgrade, but was subsequently disabled again and the bugs I had closed with it reclassed as LATER. This resolution seems to be broadly what you had in mind -- "We can't do anything with this as it stands because we need you to provide something, the ball's back in your court, ping us if you still want something done" -- and I don't really understand why it was (re)disabled. --HM _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
