On 10/08/2011 12:19 PM, Daniel Friesen wrote: > Oh right, one the 'other' things I had one mind but couldn't remember > while writing was converting things like valign, width/height, etc... > into css styles.
That'd be nice. > Though given the fact that block content in a th in XHTML was valid and > is essentially a regression in the unfinished html5 and there is an open > bug report on it I'll opt for the stance that folding headers there > should wait till we see what the decision on that is. I'm happy with that. As I tried to point out in my first post, the whole HTML validation icon was just a bit of fun (it pleased at least one person [1] :P), and the feature I actually care about is the extended section edit links. [1] http://www.progclub.org/wiki/User_talk:Sclaughl _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
