John Elliot wrote: >> That was a HTML4/XHTML1 rule that's been removed. An empty<ul></ul> is >> valid HTML5. > > I wasn't sure if the empty<ul> was valid HTML5, or if the validator > wasn't strict enough about it yet. In any event, I'm happy to take your > word for it. If XHTML support is being deprecated, I won't argue for > fixing the empty<ul> elements.
Those <ul> are an old discussion https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24500 _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
