On 1 April 2012 14:53, Svip wrote: > On 1 April 2012 13:59, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 1 April 2012 12:23, Svip <svi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> So I would take that article with a grain of salt. Particularly the >>> statement about 'real time'. That's not even feasible. >> >> That a desired monitoring regime would require a violation of physics >> has *never* stopped a legislative push for such. > > But it has always stopped it from being implemented or executed in > practice. While the development is terrifying, it is also important > to note the lack of actual consequences it will have. Other than > being a huge embarrassment.
I don't see why it *couldn't* be implemented. Note that the real time statement is no different on how they can snoop your phone calls in real time. Sure, the storage requirements would be crazy, but I don't see specific details on what is to be stored, so it may well be implementable given enough funding. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
