When we talk about the public code, why the development of new software like LQT 3 is private? Why community devs can't participate on that? When is it going to be pushed to readeable repository? I also heard from B Harris that there is a work on new interface design, which some code name, there is no code for it, why?
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Tim Starling <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/04/12 22:58, Petr Bena wrote: >> It should be clearly mentioned somewhere on guidelines for developers >> that attempts to create software which is supposed to be deployed to >> foundation sites will be likely overlooked. > > We don't want to document it when we don't want it to be the case. > Documenting it would give the impression that it is an acceptable > situation. > > Anyway, it certainly isn't the case for core contributions, or for > contributions to existing extensions, both of which have a healthy > level of community commits. The problem is limited to new extension > deployments, and perhaps to major core branch merges like IWTransclusion. > > We're not behaving like Oracle does with Java or MySQL, or like Google > does with Android. We develop code in public repositories and grant > commit access liberally. > > You're setting a high standard with your demands, but it happens to be > a standard we want to meet. So please, keep nagging and watch this space. > > -- Tim Starling > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
