This isn't true?

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/LiquidThreads_3.0

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Ariel T. Glenn <[email protected]> wrote:
> *cough* LQT 3 is private because it doesn't exist... see the date of
> that email (hint, 1st day of April).
>
> If there were to be a project like that I expect it would be very very
> public indeed. ;-)
>
> Ariel
>
> Στις 05-04-2012, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 09:10 +0200, ο/η Petr Bena έγραψε:
>> When we talk about the public code, why the development of new
>> software like LQT 3 is private? Why community devs can't participate
>> on that? When is it going to be pushed to readeable repository? I also
>> heard from B Harris that there is a work on new interface design,
>> which some code name, there is no code for it, why?
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Tim Starling <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On 04/04/12 22:58, Petr Bena wrote:
>> >> It should be clearly mentioned somewhere on guidelines for developers
>> >> that attempts to create software which is supposed to be deployed to
>> >> foundation sites will be likely overlooked.
>> >
>> > We don't want to document it when we don't want it to be the case.
>> > Documenting it would give the impression that it is an acceptable
>> > situation.
>> >
>> > Anyway, it certainly isn't the case for core contributions, or for
>> > contributions to existing extensions, both of which have a healthy
>> > level of community commits. The problem is limited to new extension
>> > deployments, and perhaps to major core branch merges like IWTransclusion.
>> >
>> > We're not behaving like Oracle does with Java or MySQL, or like Google
>> > does with Android. We develop code in public repositories and grant
>> > commit access liberally.
>> >
>> > You're setting a high standard with your demands, but it happens to be
>> > a standard we want to meet. So please, keep nagging and watch this space.
>> >
>> > -- Tim Starling
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikitech-l mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to