Hi

> There are no politics involved, there is just misunderstanding of your
> point, which is something completely different. Calling things
> 'miss-design' will also not get you helped to get this solved - we are
> not your enemy.
The last I know! :-)
But all looked like secret politics which defined these arbitrary sizes. :)
I got the hint "don't "bingo" with these sizes!" from an SVG-editor. :-/

> Yes. Essentially, you have to choose *a* size, and they might as well
> be these. The problem you are encountering is a more generic one -
> even though SVG images are scalable, you will always have rounding
> issues.
Yes.
BUT: It could also be that there is only the prominently displayed png-image
in the size of the given SVG-file and no other prefered/suggested png-sizes. ;)
Moreover, these other sizes are secretly protected from editing by the user
on the description page. This supported the subjective impression of "politics".


> That, on itself, is not a large problem.
Small (relative) differences could have big consequences. ;)
  
> So the problem is the SVG is rendered incorrectly when such an aspect
> ratio is chosen.
Yes, you could/might/may see it this way.
  
> I don't see how HCN's would solve this. It makes much more sense to
> calculate the sizes that are close to the target value (which can be
> the same as currently), but with the exact aspect ratio. So instead of
>  320 x 183, one would get 322 x 184. However, it's still a workaround:
> we really should have an SVG renderer that 'does the right thing'.
The last sentence I agree by heart. :)
And the important point is: "close" ! The now used sizes are TOO close. :-/
The should respect the ratio given by the original SVG perfectly (a suggestion).
  
> 1) update the description page to list alternate sizes that do render
> correctly (which I just did [3]).
> 2) upload a PNG version and link to that from the SVG version
> 3) fiddle with the SVG until the renderer used correctly interprets
> what you want - maybe someone with a lot of SVG-fu can do that for
> you.
3) I did four hours! :-( And tryed other SVG-coding but it did not work.
I had to mis design the Tekbir by more than 15% then some artifacts for some 
sizes vanished. 
Using a none buggy png-renderer when scaling doing, would solve this issue.
(This was my suggestion).

> Best,
> Merlijn
Thanks & Regards
Achim
-- 
Achim Flammenkamp       Fakultät für  Mathematik           Universität Bielefeld
UniversitätsstraBe 25        33501 Bielefeld         Federal Republic of Germany
UTC+01=CET     http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/achim/    [email protected]


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to