Technical: Please email ONLY to the mailing-list, not to me personally. Thanks.


On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:03:35AM +0300, Ilmari Karonen wrote:
> done to improve the rendering at arbitrary sizes:
> 
> * The "Allahu Akbar" strips are each supposed to contain 11 copies of 
I 'm still waiting that somebody changes these correct words on the quickly
added comments and png-sizes on URL 
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Iran.svg from the false "Alkmar 
Allah" -- I'm not religious, but there
exists fanatics. :-/

> the phrase, but they actually contain 12 of them, with two of the copies 
> drawn on top of each other.  This can cause one of the 11 phrases to 
But I thought drawing one color exactly at the same position as before will
result in no change. 

> appear bolder than the others at some sizes (such as the 120 x 69 px 
> size used in gallery thumbnails).  The way to fix that is simply to 
> remove the extra copies.
I did this only to make the drawing simpler and maybe faster.
 

> * The faint green/red line appearing between the phrases and the central 
> white part of the flag at some sizes occurs because the phrases and the 
> white area are different paths, and are thus rendered separately.  It 
Yes, probably right.
> would be better to merge them into a single path, and to make sure that 
> no path segments occur in places where a visible line is not supposed to 
> appear.  (That is, if you set a stroke for the path, the stroked line 
> should appear only along the boundary of the red/green and white areas.)
Good idea. But this means you must explicitly state all 22 "Alkmar Allah"
elements. This can't be the sense/usage of SVG-coding. :-(
I want to have a logical strcutred SVG code reflecting the geometric 
constrcution, not a meaningless heap of coordinates of 3 pathes for 3 colors ! 
:-((

> * The emblem in the center is built by drawing one half of it and then 
> cloning and mirroring it.  At some sizes, this can cause a faint white 
> line to appear where the two halves join together.  It would be better 
> to draw the entire emblem as a single path.
I know this issue. :-( And the current version has exactly corrected this 
problem
by add atiny logical overlap. But I think mirroring complex pathes is easier
for threndere than two times draw/interparte the compl4x path coordinates, 
doesn't it?

Look at flags of Serbia or even Ecuador, how long in real time drawing needs
because of HUGE complex pathes. :-(

> it cannot eliminate them entirely.  The only way to reliably solve the 
> problem is to design your drawings so that they don't contain coincident 
> paths.
If you are right, this means to abandoned advantage from mirror symmetries
(or rotational symmetries) to repeat sub-patterns.  I hope you are wrong with
"The only way to reliably solve" . :-/

BTW: Sorry, for my many typos and grammar mistakes and wrong wording.

Thanks for your ideas,
Achim

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to