Faidon, FYI - the i18n eng team considered Elastic Search but did not do a deep evaluation on it before selecting Solr.
-Alolita On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Faidon Liambotis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:22:05AM -0700, Asher Feldman wrote: >> I think Solr is the right direction for us to go in. Current efforts can >> pave the way for a complete refresh of WMF's article full text search as >> well as how our developers approach information retrieval. We just need to >> make sure that these efforts are unified, with commonality around the >> client api, configuration, indexing (preferably with updates asynchronously >> pushed to Solr in near real-time), and schema definition. This is >> important from an operational aspect as well, where it would be ideal to >> have a single distributed and redundant cluster. > > I'm curious, has anyone evaluated ElasticSearch and whether it'd be more > or less suitable for us than Solr? If so, I'd be very interested in the > comparison results for our use cases. > > Regards, > Faidon > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Alolita Sharma Director of Engineering Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
