On Nov 13, 2012 1:05 PM, "Andre Klapper" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 14:25 -0800, Quim Gil wrote: > > What about removing the LATER resolution from our Bugzilla? > > Picking this up again. > > Reading the postings again I mostly see support for dropping RESOLVED > LATER. > Daniel uses this for tickets whose solution is out of our control. > As mentioned they could be marked via using the "upstream" keyword > (preferably with an upstream tracking URL in the "See Also" field) in > combination with the "upstream" keyword. > > Assuming agreement that RESOLVED LATER is deprecated and lowest priority > is used, > * some community members need to adjust their Bugzilla queries to > exclude such tickets. > * we need to actively discourage the use of RESOLVED LATER for > tickets recently marked as such, and point to this thread. Help > welcome. > * we need to go through all RESOLVED LATER tickets, reopen them by > setting appropriate values (lowest priority, upstream), and > explain why (pointing to this thread). Help welcome. > > Once no RESOLVED LATER tickets remain, I can remove the resolution. > > Silence means approval. >
No it doesn't. > andre > -- > Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler > http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
