On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Matthew Flaschen <mflasc...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > On 12/12/2012 05:09 PM, Krinkle wrote: >> I agree with Sébastien. ASSIGNED is enough. >> >> I don't see the significance of whether there is a Gerrit change yet? >> >> If there is no Gerrit change, it doesn't mean nobody is working on it. >> And if there is a change, it may not be a good one and/or one written by >> someone else (e.g. someone else can give it a try, send the change-id to >> bugzilla, but the assignee hasn't reviewed it yet and/or abandoned it). > > People can look for the PATCH_IN_GERRIT status to find things to review. > As you say, some changes are good, some are not. This is another way > to attract reviewers to Gerrit changes. The Gerrit dashboard prints the first line of the change, which should begin by (bug 12345).
So your view "Bugs to review" already exists in Gerrit dashboard. -- Best Regards, Sébastien Santoro aka Dereckson http://www.dereckson.be/ _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
