[CC'ing wikitech-l@ again] On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 10:50 -0700, Chris McMahon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Andre Klapper > <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) Bugzilla already has a number of keywords such as > * need-integration-test (Selenium test should be written for > this.) > > > I didn't know this existed, and a quick look makes me think it will > take some gardening to cull actual potential browser tests, but it > might be a worthwhile exercise. > > I'm not totally convinced by these two yet, as both need > buy-in > (developers and reporters need to know and remember that QA > works on > automated browser tests, and should mark issues accordingly), > but > nothing better came to my mind in the last days. :-/ > > Thanks. I'm not certain either, and I'm still thinking...
Right after clicking the "Send" button a 3rd option came to my mind, remembering all the Mozilla bugmail that I receive. Mozilla uses a Bugzilla flag called "in-litmus". It's explained here: https://quality.mozilla.org/docs/qmo-community/lesson-plans/investigating-in-litmus-bugs/ In short, * in-litmus? indicates the bug is nominated for a testcase * in-litmus+ indicates the bug has a testcase * in-litmus- indicates the bug does not need a testcase andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
