On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:18:52 -0800, Waldir Pimenta <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Daniel Friesen
<[email protected]>wrote:
I wouldn't even include mw-config in entrypoint modifications that would
be applied to other entrypoint code.
You mean like this one <https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/49208/>? I can
understand, in the sense that it gives people the wrong idea regarding
its
relationship with the other access points, but if the documentation is
clear, I see no reason not to have mw-config/index.php benefit from
changes
when the touched code is the part common to all *entry* points (in the
strict meaning of files that can be used to enter the wiki from a web
browser).
No different changes. I was talking about this RFC:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Entrypoint_Routing_and_404_handling
Part of the plan was to move all the entrypoint handling into the common
code. All the entrypoint files like api.php would become non-mandatory.
They would basically be tiny files that all just include the MediaWiki
code in the exact same way. While the common code does the work deciding
what code to run for which entrypoint.
After that most of the paths could be blindly directed right to index.php
and the codebase would handle delegating paths like api.php to the Api,
handling 404s, etc...
mw-config/index.php would never get that tweak.
--Waldir
--
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://danielfriesen.name/]
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
