great step toward getting to an actual "media"wiki Can the player be
skinned?

*
*
*
*
*Jared Zimmerman * \\  Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia
Foundation
M : +1 415 609 4043 |   :  @JaredZimmerman<https://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman>



On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Fabrice Florin <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hey Kaldari,
>
> Thanks so much for yesterday's code fix to display videos in a modal
> viewer when you click on article thumbnails!
>
> This was long overdue and makes a huge difference already, as shown in
> this example:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congenital_insensitivity_to_pain
>
> I agree with Erik that the ideal behavior would be to play the video
> immediately after you click on the thumbnail, without requiring a second
> click to play in modal view.
>
> Now, is there any chance we could do something similar for still photos?
> As a longtime photographer, it drives me nuts that clicking on a thumbnail
> article takes you to this overwhelming page on Commons, with scary walls of
> text all around the image. (That's one of the reasons I haven't yet
> migrated any of my 20k Flickr 
> photos<http://www.flickr.com/photos/fabola/sets/> to
> Commons, BTW.)
>
> Most modern web sites nowadays just show you the photo in full screen,
> with only a few icons around it, so you can experience the image as it was
> intended to be seen (typically in a black modal panel, to make it pop up
> more). You still have the option to reveal all the text details if you want
> them, but they are not forced on you as we do today on Wikipedia and
> Commons.
>
> Hopefully, our new multimedia team will be able to join forces with the
> design team to tackle some of these commonsense UI improvements, once we
> get up to speed this summer.
>
> Thanks again for this welcome prelude :)
>
>
> Fabrice
>
>
> _______________________________
>
> Fabrice Florin
> Product Manager, Editor Engagement
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fabrice_Florin_(WMF)
>
>
> On May 30, 2013, at 1:35 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
> *From: *Erik Moeller <[email protected]>
> *Subject: **Re: [Wikitech-l] showing videos and images in modal viewers
> within articles*
> *Date: *May 29, 2013 9:21:48 PM PDT
> *To: *Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *Wikimedia developers <[email protected]>
> *Reply-To: *Wikimedia developers <[email protected]>
>
>
> Yes, better support for display of images through a modal viewer would
> be great. I'm not sure a "modal" parameter that has to be explicitly
> set for files is the best approach - I would recommend optimizing the
> default experience when a user clicks an image or video. It's not
> clear that the current behavior based on a pixel threshold is actually
> desirable as the default behavior. (On a side note, the TMH behavior
> should be improved to actually play the video immediately, not require
> a second click to play in modal view.)
>
> Magnus Manske explored an alternative approach pretty extensively in
> response to the October 2011 Coding Challenge, which is worth taking a
> look at:
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Magnus_Manske/wikipic
>
> Cheers,
> Erik
>
>
> *From: *Brion Vibber <[email protected]>
> *Subject: **Re: [Wikitech-l] showing videos and images in modal viewers
> within articles*
> *Date: *May 30, 2013 12:42:00 AM PDT
> *To: *Wikimedia developers <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *Erik Moeller <[email protected]>
> *Reply-To: *Wikimedia developers <[email protected]>
>
>
> I tend to agree that a light box or other modalish zoom should become the
> default behavior.
>
> -- brion
> On May 30, 2013 5:50 AM, "Ryan Kaldari" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> For years, I have weeped and wailed about people adding complicated maps
>
> and diagrams as 220px thumbnail images to Wikipedia articles. These sort of
>
> images are virtually useless within an article unless they are displayed at
>
> relatively large sizes. Unfortunately, including them at large sizes
>
> creates a whole new set of problems. Namely, large images mess up the
>
> formatting of the page and cause headers, edit links, and other images to
>
> get jumbled around into strange places (or even overlapping each other on
>
> occasion), especially for people on tablets or other small screens. The
>
> problem is even worse for videos. Who wants to watch a hi-res video in a
>
> tiny 220px inline viewer? If there are subtitles, you can't even read them.
>
> But should we instead include them as giant 1280px players within the
>
> article? That seems like it would be obnoxious.
>
>
> What if instead we could mark such complicated images and high-res videos
>
> to be shown in modal viewers when the user clicks on them? For example:
>
> [[File:Highres-video1.webm|**thumb|right|modal|A high res video]]. When
>
> you clicked on the thumbnail, instead of going to Commons, a modal viewer
>
> would overlay across the screen and let you view the video/image at high
>
> resolution (complete with a link to Commons and the attribution
>
> information). Believe it or not, this capability already exists for videos
>
> on Wikipedia, but it's basically a hidden feature of TimedMediaHandler. If
>
> you include a video in a page and set the size as 200px or less, it
>
> activates the modal behavior. Unfortunately, the default size for videos is
>
> 220px (as of 2010) so you will almost never see this behavior on a real
>
> article. If you want to see it, go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**
>
> American_Sign_Language#**Variation<
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Sign_Language#Variation>and click
> on one of the videos. Compare that with the video viewing
>
> experience at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Congenital_insensitivity_to_
>
> **pain <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congenital_insensitivity_to_pain>.
>
> It's a world of difference. Now imagine that same modal behavior at
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Cathedral_Peak_Granodiorite#**
>
> Geological_overview<
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathedral_Peak_Granodiorite#Geological_overview
> >and
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Battle_of_Jutland<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jutland>
>
> .
>
>
> Such an idea would be relatively trivial to implement. The steps would be:
>
> 1. Add support for a 'modal' param to the [[File:]] handler (
>
>
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/**r/#/c/66062/<https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/66062/>
>
> )
>
> 2. Add support for the 'modal' param to TimedMediaHandler (
>
>
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/**r/#/c/66063/<https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/66063/>
>
> )
>
> 3. Add support for the 'modal' param to images via some core JS module
>
> (not done yet)
>
>
> As you can see, I've already gotten started on adding this feature for
>
> videos via TimedMediaHandler, but I haven't done anything for images yet. I
>
> would like to hear people's thoughts on this potential feature and how it
>
> could be best implemented for images before doing anything else with it.
>
> What are your thoughts, concerns, ideas?
>
>
> Ryan Kaldari
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
>
> Wikitech-l mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l>
>
>
>
> *From: *Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]>
> *Subject: **Re: [Wikitech-l] showing videos and images in modal viewers
> within articles*
> *Date: *May 30, 2013 12:46:13 AM PDT
> *To: *Erik Moeller <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *Wikimedia developers <[email protected]>
> *Reply-To: *Wikimedia developers <[email protected]>
>
>
> On 5/29/13 9:21 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
>
> Yes, better support for display of images through a modal viewer would
>
> be great. I'm not sure a "modal" parameter that has to be explicitly
>
> set for files is the best approach - I would recommend optimizing the
>
> default experience when a user clicks an image or video. It's not
>
> clear that the current behavior based on a pixel threshold is actually
>
> desirable as the default behavior. (On a side note, the TMH behavior
>
> should be improved to actually play the video immediately, not require
>
> a second click to play in modal view.)
>
>
> Does anyone think it would be a bad idea to just make modal viewing the
> default for thumbnailed videos?
>
> Ryan Kaldari
>
>
>
> *From: *Antoine Musso <[email protected]>
> *Subject: **Re: [Wikitech-l] showing videos and images in modal viewers
> within articles*
> *Date: *May 30, 2013 12:52:25 AM PDT
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Reply-To: *Wikimedia developers <[email protected]>
>
>
> Le 30/05/13 05:49, Ryan Kaldari a écrit :
>
> When you clicked on the thumbnail, instead of going to Commons, a modal
>
> viewer would overlay across the screen and let you view the video/image
>
> at high resolution
>
> <snip>
>
> I discovered yesterday that Commons as such a tool to browse pictures in
> a category.  Whenever you browse a category page such as:
>  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Hackathons
>
> There is a Green icon which when hovered will expand to 'show slideshow'
> and when clicked replace the view with a slideshow view like Picassa /
> Flickr ...
>
> It would be nice to have that build in MediaWiki.  Maybe there is a well
> supported JQuery plugin that does just that and we could ship in core?
>
>
> --
> Antoine "hashar" Musso
>
>
>
> *From: *Antoine Musso <[email protected]>
> *Subject: **Re: [Wikitech-l] showing videos and images in modal viewers
> within articles*
> *Date: *May 30, 2013 1:34:35 AM PDT
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Reply-To: *Wikimedia developers <[email protected]>
>
>
> Le 30/05/13 09:46, Ryan Kaldari a écrit :
>
> Does anyone think it would be a bad idea to just make modal viewing the
>
> default for thumbnailed videos?
>
>
> Be bold!  To play it safe, you can make the feature protected with a
> global feature that we will slowly enable on all wiki and eventually
> phase out later on :-]   This way the code will land everywhere and we
> can play test it on beta then on commons ...
>
> --
> Antoine "hashar" Musso
> "did I say: 'be bold' ?"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Design mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to