On Jun 10, 2014 1:10 PM, "Jon Robson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > The other mail seems to have gone on a huge tangent about the benefits > of Flow / what it can do. This is great but I feel like my original > question has gone unanswered so I am resurrecting it with a new e-mail > subject. I worry lots of good feedback got lost in that big email > chain. > > So hypothetically... If we switched over from the unmaintained > LiquidThreads (LQT) to the maintained Flow what would happen? [By this > I mean on every page regardless of namespace that LQT is we enable > Flow instead.] > > Some top level questions to get started: > 1) Do we need to import all conversations over OR can we just switch > to a blank page to get started from? > 2) What can you do in LQT that you cannot do in Flow? (Please do not > include issues with design - this is a new product that can be > redefined as it is developed on) > 3) Any other concerns? > > Jon > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Ok, putting my love of free form talk pages aside for the present conversation... You are talking about mw.org? I think non mediawiki.org wikis requires a longer discussion. Id suggest just doing mw.org for the time being. Id like to propose caution when transitioning project:support desk. Its an important page where the change might be disruptive. Id propose: convert non support desk lqt pages. Wait a while for complaints, if nothing then convert support desk. Id also like a way to turn a flow page back to wikitext for talk pages etc in case somebody doesnt like it (i havent been following closely enough to know if that is already possible) --bawolff _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
