On 10 June 2014 09:19, Brian Wolff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 10, 2014 1:10 PM, "Jon Robson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The other mail seems to have gone on a huge tangent about the benefits > > of Flow / what it can do. This is great but I feel like my original > > question has gone unanswered so I am resurrecting it with a new e-mail > > subject. I worry lots of good feedback got lost in that big email > > chain. > > > > So hypothetically... If we switched over from the unmaintained > > LiquidThreads (LQT) to the maintained Flow what would happen? [By this > > I mean on every page regardless of namespace that LQT is we enable > > Flow instead.] > > > > Some top level questions to get started: > > 1) Do we need to import all conversations over OR can we just switch > > to a blank page to get started from? > > 2) What can you do in LQT that you cannot do in Flow? (Please do not > > include issues with design - this is a new product that can be > > redefined as it is developed on) > > 3) Any other concerns? >
> You are talking about mw.org? I think non mediawiki.org wikis requires a > longer discussion. Id suggest just doing mw.org for the time being. > I disagree. Instead, I would suggest having just the smidgen of patience and actually waiting when the Flow team have responded on the thread and told you it'd take some time, rather than posting the same request in a second thread because you didn't get the answer you wanted. J. -- James D. Forrester Product Manager, VisualEditor Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. [email protected] | @jdforrester _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
