I fully agree with Dan on that. I'd be much more interested in +/- votes on feedback statements. I think that might be a direction worth exploring. A low barrier like that might help bring a more complete picture of sentiment on problems and ideas.
DJ On 20 aug. 2014, at 19:08, Dan Garry <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20 August 2014 09:16, Quim Gil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm not sure how related is this, but Article Feedback allowed user rating >> + comment, and it was deployed in Wikimedia servers. Editors didn't find it >> that useful for regular articles (too much extra work processing too little >> value feedback on top of Talk pages), but maybe this could (with small or >> not so small adaptation, I don't know) in the very specific context of a >> beta feature page. >> > > Speaking as someone who's been the product owner of a beta feature, I know > I'd find a star rating for a beta feature totally useless. Star ratings > don't tell you anything about *why* a user likes or dislikes a feature, so > I have no information to go off. > > In terms of getting feedback from comments, you're right that that's > useful. But I can get that right now by going to the discussion page of the > beta feature. Bear in mind that the Hovercards talk page on mediawiki.org > was, for a while, the most active Flow page *across the entire cluster.* > > So, I'm left a little unclear what the proposed improvement actually is. > > Dan > > -- > Dan Garry > Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps > Wikimedia Foundation > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
