To be clear, i think some common sense should apply - e.g. If someone was
fired for trying to put a backdoor in MW they shouldnt automatically get
their rights back.

But generally speaking if they were trusted before WMF, I trust they have
the maturity after WMF to use their rights appropriately even if they are
angry or whatever. If that trust was misguided their rights can easily be
removed later (this is +2 not shell we are talking about after all).

--
Brian

On Wednesday, January 25, 2017, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> I support restoring the rights in this case, but I'm not sure it should be
> automatic in all cases. If having +2 rights is relatively harmless and
> reversible, then an automatic (but announced) restoration of the rights
> should be fine.
>
> The issue is that someone who leaves the foundation could do so under
> unfriendly terms, possibly affecting their ability to do good work. I know
> we don't want to think that a previously productive volunteer could later
> cause problems, but it is possible.
>
> That's why I think there should be some form of check, so we have
> confidence that this person still has good intentions. For example, their
> manager and/or someone from Talent & Culture could be consulted, or
trusted
> people who still have close contact with the person so know their state of
> mind. It could be quick and lightweight, in almost all cases, but skipping
> that step entirely seems risky to me. Unless, as I said, having +2 really
> isn't a big deal.
>
>
>
>
> Kevin Smith
> Agile Coach, Wikimedia Foundation
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Subramanya Sastry <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 01/25/2017 10:04 AM, Brian Wolff wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2017, Legoktm <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> After speaking with Yurik, I've filed
>>>> <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T156219> on his behalf to restore
his
>>>> membership in the mediawiki and maps-dev groups.
>>>>
>>>> I would appreciate guidance in whether these rights can be summarily
>>>> granted since he used to have them, or if it needs to go through the
>>>> full process.
>>>>
>>>> -- Legoktm
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>>>
>>> I support doing this automatically in any similar situation in the
future.
>>>
>>> --
>>> brian
>>>
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> Subbu.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to