Correct me if I'm wrong but I think If someone has +2 rights before joining WMF, leaving WMF is not a reason to remove rights at all. If there was a case someone abuse their power and gets fired because of that. "The abuse" should be the reason to lose the right not "leaving WMF"/"being fired"/etc..
Best On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:35 AM Brian Wolff <bawo...@gmail.com> wrote: > To be clear, i think some common sense should apply - e.g. If someone was > fired for trying to put a backdoor in MW they shouldnt automatically get > their rights back. > > But generally speaking if they were trusted before WMF, I trust they have > the maturity after WMF to use their rights appropriately even if they are > angry or whatever. If that trust was misguided their rights can easily be > removed later (this is +2 not shell we are talking about after all). > > -- > Brian > > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017, Kevin Smith <ksm...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > I support restoring the rights in this case, but I'm not sure it should > be > > automatic in all cases. If having +2 rights is relatively harmless and > > reversible, then an automatic (but announced) restoration of the rights > > should be fine. > > > > The issue is that someone who leaves the foundation could do so under > > unfriendly terms, possibly affecting their ability to do good work. I > know > > we don't want to think that a previously productive volunteer could later > > cause problems, but it is possible. > > > > That's why I think there should be some form of check, so we have > > confidence that this person still has good intentions. For example, their > > manager and/or someone from Talent & Culture could be consulted, or > trusted > > people who still have close contact with the person so know their state > of > > mind. It could be quick and lightweight, in almost all cases, but > skipping > > that step entirely seems risky to me. Unless, as I said, having +2 really > > isn't a big deal. > > > > > > > > > > Kevin Smith > > Agile Coach, Wikimedia Foundation > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Subramanya Sastry < > ssas...@wikimedia.org> > > wrote: > > > >> On 01/25/2017 10:04 AM, Brian Wolff wrote: > >> > >>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2017, Legoktm <legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> After speaking with Yurik, I've filed > >>>> <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T156219> on his behalf to restore > his > >>>> membership in the mediawiki and maps-dev groups. > >>>> > >>>> I would appreciate guidance in whether these rights can be summarily > >>>> granted since he used to have them, or if it needs to go through the > >>>> full process. > >>>> > >>>> -- Legoktm > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Wikitech-l mailing list > >>>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > >>>> > >>> I support doing this automatically in any similar situation in the > future. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> brian > >>> > >> > >> +1. > >> > >> Subbu. > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wikitech-l mailing list > >> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikitech-l mailing list > > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
