2018-04-04 23:41 GMT+03:00 Brad Jorsch (Anomie) <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Strainu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Skipping navboxes is a decision that was taken by the WMF team >> responsible for the mobile site (whatever it was called at the time) >> and can be solved cleanly only at the skin level, but I don't expect >> this to happen as long as it will break the mobile site. >> >> Your proposal would be the ideal argument for reversing the current >> "solution", yes, but realistically, it's not going to happen >> throughout the hundreds of wikis that implemented navboxes. >> > > Here we're talking about Isarra's very interesting project to make the > Monobook skin responsive, not whatever decisions WMF's mobile teams may > have made in the past for their mobile-only skin. She is not obligated to > follow their lead just because they led, and I'd recommend she doesn't in > this case.
Maybe I wasn't clear, but that's exactly what I meant as well: I'm very curious to see how *Mobile MonoBook* handles that particular issue. I most certainly hope Isarra *doesn't* follow Minerva's (mis)behavior. If the solution is acceptable, perhaps it can then be adapted to Minerva. However, I haven't found any navboxes in the demo wiki. Strainu > > Note that's my personal recommendation and not any sort of official WMF > position. I likely won't even be involved in the code review for her patch. > > > -- > Brad Jorsch (Anomie) > Senior Software Engineer > Wikimedia Foundation > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
