----- Original Message -----
> From: "Platonides" <[email protected]>

> > 3) I see there are usability talks. Improving usability is good, but
> > targetting at people who don't want to be "technically proficient"
> > (emphasis: DON'T WANT TO BE, not just "ARE NOT") and just want to press
> > a magic button and "that's all" is not good. There are topics like
> > "internal vs external links, users tend to find one and ignore other" -
> > that's ridiculous, that's NOT the usability problem. I.e. I think we
> > shouldn't think of "usability initiatives" as of 100% correct ideas.
> 
> The Visual Editor is the candy with which you try to engage them.

Sure. 

I think the argument being made here -- it is certainly mine -- is simply
"please don't penalize the 'smart people' to benefit the masses, regardless
of how many people are in each group".

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       [email protected]
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274

_______________________________________________
Wikitext-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitext-l

Reply via email to