On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:24:08 +0100, you wrote:
>roboform behaves exactly as you describe when used in fox, and it's
>non-symantec, which can only be a plus :)
>
>Hugh Gundersen wrote on 29/04/2006, 07:26:
>
> > Don't tell me that "form filler" or another will - I've tried it and
> > it's real crap compared to N-PWM. Norton acts automatically whereas the
> > other needs physical intervention to actually spring to life and do
> > something.
>
>
>--
>Regards
>
>Kylde
The first or second description.
RoboForm was the one.... Don't work automatically in IE and definitely
needs a kick to wake it up.
You may be against the big names but since Peter Norton's (1986-7) days
I have always trusted Norton or Symantec and they have NEVER let me
down. I read here and there about other anti-virus (viruii?) progs that
stop other things working and systems to crash non of which I have ever
experienced and the auto updates are fast and install perfectly.
Sir Hugh of Bognor
--
Remember. You may honestly believe that you understood everything
you thought I said but what you thought you heard wasn't
exactly what I said.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E38
Bognor Regis, W.Sussex, England, UK
--
----------------------------------------
To Change your email Address for this list, send the following message:
CHANGE WIN-HOME your_old_address your_new_address
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note carefully that both old and new addresses are required.
