Thankyou Pete,

My memory isn't as good as it once was. ;-)

On Saturday 04 November 2006 17:12, Pete Holsberg Inscribed Thus:
> Gaffer wrote:
> > Hello Pete,
> >
> > On Saturday 04 November 2006 00:23, Pete Holsberg Inscribed Thus:
> >> Remember that, in the 1980s, Microsoft was working on its own
> >> version of UNIX. They licensed it from AT&T and renamed it Xenix.
> >> /Deja vu/?
> >
> > Indeed !   But wasn't there some agreement that prevented M$
> > marketing it !
>
> "Microsoft did not sell Xenix directly to end users; instead, they
> licensed it to software OEMs such as Intel, Tandy, Altos and SCO, who
> then ported <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porting> it to their own
> proprietary computer architectures
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_architecture>. Microsoft Xenix
> originally ran on the PDP-11 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDP-11>;
> the first port <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porting> was for the
> Zilog <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zilog> Z8001
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z8001> 16-bit processor
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_processing_unit>. Altos
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acer_%28company%29> shipped a version
> for their computers early in 1982
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1982>, Tandy Corporation shipped
> *TRS-XENIX* for their 68000
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/68000>-based systems in January 1983
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983>, and SCO released their port to
> the Intel 8086 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_8086> processor in
> September 1983 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983>. A port to the
> 68000-based Apple Lisa <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Lisa> also
> existed. At the time, Xenix was based on AT&T's UNIX System III
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIX_System_III>.
>
> "Version 2.0 of Xenix was released in 1985
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1985> and was based on UNIX System V
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIX_System_V>. An update numbered
> 2.1.1 added support for the Intel 80286
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_80286> processor. Subsequent
> releases improved System V compatibility.
>
> "When Microsoft entered into an agreement with IBM
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Business_Machines> to
> develop OS/2 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS/2>, it lost interest in
> promoting Xenix. In 1987 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1987>
> Microsoft transferred ownership of Xenix to SCO in an agreement that
> left Microsoft owning 25% of SCO."

-- 
Best Regards:
     Derrick.
     Pontefract Linux Users Group.
     plug at play-net.co.uk

--
                ----------------------------------------
WIN-HOME Archives:  http://PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM/archives/WIN-HOME.html
Contact the List Owner about anything:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Official Win-Home List Members Profiles Page
 http://www.besteffort.com/winhome/Profiles.html

Reply via email to