I would be very interested in how you use object navigation.
I have attempted to use this on many occasions and NVDA has never reported
anything that was not in case , available with the normal screen cursor.
Basically I am using the num pad keys as descried in the manual.

A short example of where you have successfully used object navigation to
access otherwise inaccessible parts of the screen and the keystrokes you use
to achieve this would be very useful.

David Griffith .

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nicolai
Svendsen
Sent: 06 April 2013 12:40
To: Windows Access; Share Your Enthusiasm!
Subject: Re: The Word Is Out!

Hi!

I actually use NVDA on an everyday basis at this point, and I've found I can
work with NVDA's object navigation as a substitute for JAWS virtual cursor
and all those other cursors JAWS has. I actually find it a lot easier to
use, and it gives me a much better overview. I haven't found JAWS to work
that great with web applications either. Further, in NVDA 2013.1 NVDA
receives more support for Powerpoint applications and general Office
improvements, and that's actually working out quite well. At this rate I'm
finding applications that work better with NVDA, but I'd be curious to know
which ones you use often so I can file tickets and look into it. NVDA is
open source, after all. NVDA add-ons are very handy here, and they're just
like JAWS scripts.

I don't plan to purchase my SMA for JAWS again, even if I'd had different
results than what I'm getting. I'd have to pay four SMAs to get my license
up-to-date, just in order to retain my serial number. That would cost $195
less than the standard license since their SMAs cost $200 now, but it's
still not worth it since things work pretty well for me at the moment. Plus,
I hardly need researching features in a screen-reading application, but I do
think Flexible Web is kind of interesting. You don't need that with
VoiceOver because a lot of these advertisements are contained within frames
so VoiceOver needs to interact first, but NVDA and JAWS don't. NVDA does if
you use object navigation, but NVDA groups lists and other elements together
which means you have to interact with it to read their content. I've mostly
seen this with lists though, so I suppose you could use that to navigate if
it's a big deal, but it's still a pretty interesting feature..

Both JAWS and NVDA rely on MSAA/IAccessible2, so you should actually get
pretty similar results unless the controls require extra work as is the case
with Powerpoint with both screen readers, so JAWS isn't excluded here. MSAA,
for instance, does not provide sufficient information. It does not allow you
to retrieve the location of the cursor, or retrieve individual units of text
in an editable text field, which is part of the issues with inaccessible
applications using these APIs.

Anyway, I won't go on a technical rant, so I hope this kind of makes sense!

Regards,
Nicolai
On Apr 6, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Dane Trethowan <[email protected]> wrote:

> You're quite right! there is a bit of Freedom Science Fiction bashing and
with good reason, who can forget that disgraceful episode when Freedom
Scientology took GW Micro to court over the issue of place markers, I
believe that particular case was settled out of court.
> 
> Then there's the other case of Freedom Science Fiction deliberately trying
to take a company out of business just because they had a name which just
happened to use the word "Freedom" in it.
> 
> Thankfully the people at System Access had sense enough not to be
intimidated and they changed their name, the rest of course is history, that
being we now have yet another Screen Reader for Windows in the form of
System Access, yet more competition to JAWS, Window-Eyes and so on which can
only be a good thing.
> 
> Despite all the bashing as you put it, I'm prepared to give credit where
its due and express my view thus, unless GW Micro do something such as a
rewrite of many parts of Window-Eyes then they're going to see themselves
swamped! by the competition and that's not a good thing.
> 
> I was most interested to hear your opinions on the Mac and I'm sorry you
didn't get too far with that however I acknowledge without hesitation that
the Mac is not for everything and I'm very pleased you tried it rather than
pretending to try it and deliberately putting obstacles or doubts in your
way and into other peoples minds.
> 
> I use a variety of platforms here for a variety of reasons and all have
their good and bad points, advantages and disadvantages, likes and dislikes,
pleasures and pains, weakness and strengths... well you get the drift
<smile>.
> 
> 
> On 06/04/2013, at 2:34 PM, David Griffith <[email protected]>
wrote:
> 
>> I know that Freedom Scientific bashing has been in vogue over the 
>> last few years. They are a commercial company and do not appear to 
>> have always unstinctingly operate in their customers best interests. 
>> Nevertheless I have been, in practice, reliant on their implementations
of Jaws since 2006.
>> 
>> As, with others,  I have resented the annual upgrage fee I have tried 
>> to make the break firstly with experimenting with exclusive use of 
>> NVDA on Windows, and then secondly by purchasing an iMac for 
>> voiceover usage.  Sadly in both circumstances I have had to return to 
>> windows and Jaws for serious Office productivity taks. When the 
>> pressure is on, and the chips are down, jaws is what I rely upon. I 
>> now conclude that in order to retain this productivity edge the 
>> yearly Upgrade cost for Jaws  is sadly the price I have to pay. There 
>> is no feasible way I could nowadays, for example , rely upon Jaws 11,
NVDA or voiceover.
>> 
>> I cannot comment on Window eyes as I have never used it.
>> Genrally though, with some exceptions, Jaws continues to provide the 
>> maximum accessibility for me.
>> Whilst if I had to, I could survive without forking out for Jaws 
>> every year, and use NVDA, I would need at least a demo copy of Jaws 
>> to assist me with difficult access.
>> 
>> The lack of a virtual screen cursor in NVDA means that there are some 
>> situations where only Jaws wil do.
>> 
>> There are a few happy circumstances where NVDA will outperform Jaws, 
>> for example in gaining limited access to the generally inaccessible 
>> Calibre Ebook software, but these are the exception rather than the rule.
>> Where access is difficult only Jaws can often solve problems.
>> For example the other week I had an inaccessible interface to deal 
>> with , The Adobe Music Importer for the Amazon cloud Player.
>> Using Virtual OCR, and then  reviewing the results with the Jaws 
>> cursor and performing virtual mouse clicks I was able to get some 
>> functionality out of a program which would have been impossible with 
>> NVDA or Voiceover on the Mac. It was clunky, requiring me to run OCR 
>> multiple  times as the screen was updated but I got it to work after a
fashion.
>> More importanly, For Office productivity,  Jaws and Microsoft Office 
>> remains the only serious option for me.
>> I am managing to stick with Office 2003 but I am heavily reliant on 
>> Jaws for table management,  header and style management, index and 
>> content creation and so on.
>> I also have become increasingly reliant on the Jaws text Analyser 
>> tool over the last 24 months to produce professional looking output. 
>> I know of no screen reader which provides equivalent text analysis 
>> functionality, though it is possible Window Eyes does. Certainly NVDA 
>> and voiceover on the Mac do not cut the mustard here. It was not 
>> until I started to use Text analyser a couple of years ago that I 
>> realised the formatting and presentational errors I was creating.  My 
>> reliance on sighted proof reading has plummetted since I started
utilising this and other tools.
>> 
>> A similar experience is provided on the web.  Whilst NVDA and 
>> Voiceover provide feasible web access, and occasionally outperform 
>> Jaws, in genral only Jaws will do.
>> 
>> The bafflingly complicated and restricted text selection  limtations 
>> of Safari with Voiceover make it impractical for rapid academic 
>> searches. Some elements, including some headers are impossible to 
>> select and copy with Voiceover except by using last phrase copied. It 
>> is impossible to copy more than a paragraph because of the text 
>> interactional limits unless you want to select and copy the entire 
>> web page. I could survive with various strategies with Safari and 
>> Voiceover but it just takes too much time to flexibly extract the 
>> content of web pages I need. NVDA is better and sometimes more stable but
I find the fasterst browsing experience remains with jaws.
>> 
>> I invested a lot of time looking at the potential of NVDA and 
>> voiceover as alternatives to Jaws. In practice still I play with 
>> Voiceover and NVDA, but work with Jaws. I wish it were not so and 
>> that the fre screen reading alternatives provided feasible office
comdpetition that I could rely upon.
>> At the moment they do not. Nobody has ever been able to demonstrate 
>> to me that the Mac currently a viable serious Office platform  for a 
>> blind user, though some limited functionality is certainly possible 
>> if your needs are not that great and you are prepared to work at it.
>> I saw only yesterday somebody trying to defend Office functionality 
>> on the mac by saying she simply bans people from sending table 
>> formatted matgerial to her.  This is not a serious  response and 
>> would be considered eccentric and probelmatic in most of the jobs I 
>> have done over the years.  It is only a feasible response if you want 
>> to remain a non professinal amateur dabbling on the fringes of 
>> access.  A strategy reliant on instructing the Department of Health 
>> not to use tables in the material they sent to me when I was an NHS
Manager  is so absurd as to be ridiculous.
>> In practice whilst using NVDA on a Windows platform is more feasible 
>> than voiceover on the Mac for office usage, it also lacks some crucial
tools.
>> 
>> David Griffith
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dane 
>> Trethowan
>> Sent: 06 April 2013 02:54
>> To: Windows Access; Share Your Enthusiasm!
>> Subject: The Word Is Out!
>> 
>> Okay, I'm not afraid whatever to admit if I'm wrong and I certainly 
>> have been wrong when it comes to good Screen Reading software, JAWS 
>> and Window-Eyes.
>> 
>> I've been using JAWS 13.0 for the last 4 weeks or so and - in my 
>> opinion - accessibility to Windows software thanks to JAWS blows GW 
>> Micro away and that's a shame as Window-Eyes is far behind in several
crucial areas.
>> 
>> the most obvious is the Internet browsing facilities, and another is 
>> training material - material to help new and old users alike - become 
>> familiar with the Screen Reader and associated Windows Applications, 
>> concepts etc.
>> 
>> Most people on list would know what I'm talking about so I needen't 
>> say any more but I will say that I've decided to put my money where 
>> my mouth is, I ordered JAWS yesterday.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> **********
>> 
>> Dane Trethowan
>> Skype: grtdane12
>> Phone US (213) 438-9741
>> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> =======================================
>> 
>> To post to this group, please send your message to:
>> [email protected]
>> The Windows-Access E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, 
>> Trojan, virus and worm-free
>> 
>> To modify your subscription options, please visit your personalise 
>> subscriber options page, located at 
>> http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/windows-access
>> 
>> You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Windows-Access 
>> forum at either of the following websites:
>> http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/windows-access/index.html
>> Or:
>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
>> 
>> you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.
>> xml>
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> =======================================
>> 
>> To post to this group, please send your message to:
>> [email protected]
>> The Windows-Access E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, 
>> Trojan, virus and worm-free
>> 
>> To modify your subscription options, please visit your personalise 
>> subscriber options page, located at 
>> http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/windows-access
>> 
>> You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Windows-Access
forum at either of the following websites:
>> http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/windows-access/index.html
>> Or:
>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
>> 
>> you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.
>> xml>
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> [email protected]
> 
> 
> **********
> 
> Dane Trethowan
> Skype: grtdane12
> Phone US (213) 438-9741
> Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
> 
> 
> 
> =======================================
> 
> To post to this group, please send your message to:
> [email protected]
> The Windows-Access E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, 
> Trojan, virus and worm-free
> 
> To modify your subscription options, please visit your personalise 
> subscriber options page, located at 
> http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/windows-access
> 
> You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Windows-Access forum
at either of the following websites:
> http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/windows-access/index.html
> Or:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
> 
> you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.x
> ml>
> 
> ---------------------------------------
> 
> 
> [email protected]

=======================================

To post to this group, please send your message to:
[email protected]
The Windows-Access E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan,
virus and worm-free

To modify your subscription options, please visit your personalise
subscriber options page, located at
http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/windows-access

You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Windows-Access forum
at either of the following websites:
http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/windows-access/index.html
Or:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>

you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml>

---------------------------------------


[email protected]

=======================================

To post to this group, please send your message to:
[email protected]
The Windows-Access E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus 
and worm-free

To modify your subscription options, please visit your personalise subscriber 
options page, located at
http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/windows-access

You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Windows-Access forum at 
either of the following websites:
http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/windows-access/index.html
Or:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>

you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml>

---------------------------------------


[email protected]

Reply via email to