Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How about to check prototypes of API functions in the headers too? >> Currently everyone should add prototypes to headers themself when >> they needed to use them. > >What has that to do with documentation? >I guess you mean winapi_check in general. Yes, I did. >Anyway GNU C options -Wmissing-prototypes and >-Wmissing-declarations does that already so I didn't think >it worth while to check it in winapi_check as well. > >Of course winapi_check can be made do more advanced checks, >like checking the parameter names. So what do you wish to check? Some time ago Bertho Stultiens rised a problem with duplicated/wrong/missing prototypes in Wine header files. But since then nobody tryed to fix that. I thought that winapi_check might do that as well. How difficult it will be to add this feature? Dmitry.
- A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Francois Gouget
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Patrik Stridvall
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Francois Gouget
- Re: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Dmitry Timoshkov
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Patrik Stridvall
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Dmitry Timoshkov
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Patrik Stridvall
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Patrik Stridvall
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Francois Gouget
- Re: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Jeremy White
- Re: A case for Wine and Contributing to ... Francois Gouget
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Francois Gouget
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Patrik Stridvall
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Francois Gouget
- RE: A case for Wine and Contributing to Wine Patrik Stridvall