> > > and noticed a few differences with the one you posted:
> > > - compobj disappeared from the list. Why is that?
> >
> > No idea, I will investigate. But please note that DLL:s that
> > doesn't have any stubs are not presented. Compobj is not one
> > of them though.
>
> Hey, that's bad for the stats!
I have fixed that. All DLL:s seem to be listed now,
with the latest patch, just sent to wine-patches.
I found one serious bug and several minor bug that
are now fixed.
BTW, with the new patch you can do
winapi_check --none --win16 --win32 --stubs
to just get the stub statistics. Not that it matter
since you filter...
> Still, I'd be interesting to see the results of a
> cross-reference with CodeWeavers' API database. Obviously,
> with the way
> Wine has been developped there must be quite a good overlap
> which should
> make the ratio implemented-API/used-API much higher. But just how much
> higher??? I'm curious.
Indeed. Hmm reminds me, I will have to implement a option in winapi_check
that warns that a specific function is a stub, so we can make a
script that does the cross checking. Shouldn't be to hard.
