> See: http://fgouget.free.fr/wine/winapi_stats-en.shtml
Nice. Except that my name (Patrik Stridvall) has the wrong spelling.
> I reran winapi_check with the version currently in Source Safe
You mean CVS? :-)
> and noticed a few differences with the one you posted:
> - compobj disappeared from the list. Why is that?
No idea, I will investigate. But please note that DLL:s that
doesn't have any stubs are not presented. Compobj is not one
of them though.
I don't think there are any though.
> - 3 functions have disappeared from kernel32. That's strange too.
> - 4 functions were added (and implemented) in shell32 and 3
> in shlwapi.
I have some rejected, and some not yet submitted changes in
that tree, that should explain it I think.
> I guess that means we're making progress.
> - urlmon and wininet are now taken into account.
> - Hey, icmp is still missing? I guess I should have a look at it and
> write an icmp.api file.
There is already a icmp.api. Anyway if should have worked regardless,
urlmon and wininet doesn't have any .api files yet either.
Strange, I will investigate.
> 45% of the listed functions have been implemented. That's not so
> bad after all.
Well, if you wish to make the statistics better, there are a lot of
CRTDLL functions that can be quite easily implemented. Just call the
corresponding function in libc...
Of course it will not make many more applications run since the
reason nobody have bothered implementing them is that no application
has been found that calls them yet. But it will make the statistics
better. :-)
In short, a lot of pain for little or no gain, but if somebody doesn't
have anything to do, its better than nothing.
