RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support

[Patrik Stridvall]

> > Then we have the strange fact that wchar_t is 32-bit,
> > which I never really understood since most Unicode
> > support in Unix is UTF8 IIRC.
> 
> Unicode support in Unix is UTF8? Not sure what you meant 
> here, there are
> no Unicode routines anywhere that take UTF8 strings in Unix 
> that I know of
> (apart from the charset conversion routines like mbstowcs and 
> iconv, of
> course).

Oh, I mean nothing. :-)

Just showing my miss understanding on how Unicode in Unix works,
which will hopefully be less know.

Thanks for the explaination.