Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you consider an Windows _application_ that can be compiled as both ASCII > and Unicode as less maintainable? Yes; it all looks very nice in theory, but when you try to deal with real life problems, like file I/O for instance, this TCHAR magic is a pain, and you end up with #ifdef UNICODE all over the place. > > Embedded systems may want Unicode too (CE is mostly Unicode AFAIK). > > Sure you can run Unicode only if you wish. No; most typical apps need a mix of the two, because you want Unicode when dealing with the user interface so that you can support multiple languages, but you don't want to convert your whole app to use Unicode internally where it's not necessary. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Patrik Stridvall
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Ove Kaaven
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Steve Langasek
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Ove Kaaven
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Steve Langasek
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode su... Ove Kaaven
- Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Dimitrie O. Paun
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Patrik Stridvall
- Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Alexandre Julliard
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Patrik Stridvall
- Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Alexandre Julliard
- Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support James Sutherland
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Patrik Stridvall
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Patrik Stridvall
- Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Alexandre Julliard
- Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support David Elliott
- Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support... Juergen Schmied
- RE: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Patrik Stridvall
- Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support David Elliott
- Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support Dimitrie O. Paun
- Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support gerard patel