Re: More on the ASCII/Unicode support

[Alexandre Julliard]

Patrik Stridvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This mean that we in theory could support with compile options
> (1) W->A with auto generated conversions (pseudo Unicode support)
> (2) A->W with auto generated conversions (your proposal)
> (3) Double compilation (my proposal)
> (4) A only
> (5) W only
> 
> Sure the input files will need to use TCHAR and friends,
> but they will use just as much memory as they do now
> if we compile with option (2).
> 
> What do you think?

No thanks.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]