Patrik Stridvall wrote:
> +print ' "." #stdcall_name ":\n"' . " \\\n";=0A=
> +print ' "\tmovl (%edx), %ecx\n"' . " \\\n";=0A=
> +print ' "\tmovl %eax, (%edx)\n"' . " \\\n";=0A=
> +print ' "\tmovl %ecx, %eax\n"' . " \\\n";=0A=
> +if($pic) {=0A=
> + print ' "\tsubl $8, %edx\n"' . " \\\n";=0A=
> +} else {=0A=
> + print ' "\tsubl $4, %edx\n"' . " \\\n";=0A=
> +}=0A=
> +print ' "\tleal (%esp), %ecx\n"' . " \\\n";=0A=
> +print ' "\tcmpl %ecx, %edx\n"' . " \\\n";=0A=
> +print ' "\tjge ." #stdcall_name "\n"' . " \\\n";=0A=
Well, this won't work if pic: you are subtracting 8 in *each* pass
of the loop! B.t.w. as you're copying every argument anyway,
why not simply use a sequence of 'push'es? It's not as if we
needed to conserve stack space ...
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
