> Hmm ?? > What about a simple > if (we_want_thread_safety_NOW) > EnterCriticalSection(...); > . > . > . > if (we_want_thread_safety_NOW) > LeaveCriticalSection(...); > > and wine.conf parameter ? > > Or does this burn still too many CPU cycles ? It is the reentrancy protection that cost the most. Having runtime choice of thread safety doesn't cost very much compare to that. However if we doesn't need reentrancy it will be noticeable, especially if we compile with -fPIC, which we currenly do.
- Re: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Andreas Mohr
- RE: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Patrik Stridvall
- Re: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Lionel Ulmer
- Re: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Ulrich Weigand
- Re: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Lionel Ulmer
- Re: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation James Sutherland
- Re: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Ulrich Weigand
- Re: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translatio... Lionel Ulmer
- RE: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Patrik Stridvall
- Re: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Lionel Ulmer
- RE: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Patrik Stridvall
- RE: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Patrik Stridvall
- Re: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Ulrich Weigand
- RE: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Patrik Stridvall
- Re: Automatic CDECL / STDCALL translation Ulrich Weigand