At 07:19 PM 5/21/00 +0200, you wrote: >That way you have an "error message number" which allows for complete >tracking of a specific error. >And of course this number would be unique throughout Wine's life. Yes, nice feature to be able from an error code to go directly to the offending line of code. It's already the case that the same message is displayed at different points of failure. Maybe it's not absolutely necessary for an alpha release than an explicit message in the user's language could be displayed IMO. But implementing this by hand would be a huge task. Maybe some magical Perl script ? Gerard
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Dimitrie O. Paun
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Andreas Mohr
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Dimitrie O. Paun
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Marcus Meissner
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Marcus Meissner
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Francois Gouget
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- Re: *Much* better error msgs gerard patel
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Dimitrie O. Paun
- RE: *Much* better error msgs Patrik Stridvall
- Re: *Much* better error msgs gerard patel
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Dimitrie O. Paun
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- FormatMessage/Message compiler (was: Re: *Much* bett... Bertho Stultiens
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland