On Sun, 21 May 2000, gerard patel wrote:
> At 02:53 PM 5/21/00 -0400, you wrote:
>
> >What do you mean. Right now you get both the filename and line
> >number. Isn't that enough?
> >
>
> I was believing the subject was trace ? Here is what was in Andi's first post:
>
> FIXME( "FATAL: Need to relocate %s, but no relocation records present
>(%s). Try to run that file directly !\n",
>
> So I think it's about trace, not *crashes*, right ?
>
> If yes, where do you see a filename and a line number in what follows:
>
> err:module:BUILTIN32_dlopen failed to load libborlndmm.fr.so: libborlndmm.fr.so:
>cannot open shared object file: Aucun fichier ou r_pertoire de ce type.
Sorry, I wasn't thinking right when I wrote that. What I was thinking is
that it is trivial to display file and/or line number. I wasn't done this
way because it was cluttering the code. You see, function name is enough
because the probability that the same function outputs the same message
twice is very small.
> Btw, for your question about my doc patch, Eric answered already; also I think
> using a local repository would result in less work to do for the server.
Right. It just seemed to me that the wording implied that you _need_ to
get a local copy, when in fact you don't. Maybe we should say that the
step is optional. In fact, getting a local copy is orthogonal to the rest
of the task.
--
Dimi.
