On Sun, 21 May 2000, gerard patel wrote: > At 07:19 PM 5/21/00 +0200, you wrote: > >That way you have an "error message number" which allows for complete > >tracking of a specific error. > >And of course this number would be unique throughout Wine's life. > > Yes, nice feature to be able from an error code to go directly to the offending > line of code. It's already the case that the same message is displayed at different > points of failure. What do you mean. Right now you get both the filename and line number. Isn't that enough? -- Dimi.
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Andreas Mohr
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Dimitrie O. Paun
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Marcus Meissner
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Marcus Meissner
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Francois Gouget
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- Re: *Much* better error msgs gerard patel
- RE: *Much* better error msgs Dimitrie O. Paun
- RE: *Much* better error msgs Patrik Stridvall
- Re: *Much* better error msgs gerard patel
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Dimitrie O. Paun
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- FormatMessage/Message compiler (was: Re: *Much* bett... Bertho Stultiens
- Re: *Much* better error msgs Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: *Much* better error msgs James Sutherland
- RE: *Much* better error msgs Patrik Stridvall