Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm. I've seen many more bug reports caused by elf dependencies into
> /usr/lib/wine than I've seen reports caused by mismatched dlls, and the
> most mismatches I can recall seeing is libwine.so... and a late abort does
> give a comprehensive message. I don't understand the "too late" argument,
> since there's nothing else we can do about it than abort anyway if it's
> detected early.
Yes but it's IMO better if Wine fails to start than if it appears to
run but sometimes dies when hitting missing symbols.
> But if you think so... it seems we should then announce
> that EXTRA_LD_LIBRARY_PATH shouldn't be used after all, so the RPM-making
> guys don't use it? How?
Maybe we could print a warning if there are directories in
EXTRA_LD_LIBRARY_PATH that are not also in LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
