Re: Wine packaging - part 2 - what RPM/DEBs do

[Alexandre Julliard]

Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>     I don't recall a discussion in which putting the spec file building
> stuff in CVS was rejected.  I think it's a great idea to have it in CVS.
> Did I miss something?  I suppose Alexandre is the real authority,
> because he's the one who'll bounce any patch sent in...  Alexandre?

I don't think this belongs in CVS, mainly because there is no way to
have one authoritative spec file; every distribution needs a different
one. So I think it's much better to place the common stuff in a
separate script (like wineinstall), have a good documentation
explaining the various issues (like packaging.sgml), and leave it up
to the package developer to figure out the platform-specific details.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]